Weekly Discussion Subject Three - Dark Orders, How Should They Evolve

To me it's all about 'empire'... each practitioner must build their own, and any Order would be systems of support to that end, with participation ranging from communalism, through to various types of mutualism. The point of this is as per the Code, developing maximum power to be free as most from fetters as possible, or more practically being able to chose which ones and having the power to keep choosing.

As to me evolution is a conservative movement of increased functional structure, improving upon progress with guided trial and error to keep progressing; and not to be confused with simpler evolutionary mechanism's like survival of the fittest which are more like functions/phases of progress than actual evolution per se.

As to what structure an Order would have, it depends on the platform and what it delivers and requires and who is willing and able to manage conduct according to its efficient use to it's intended purpose.

As to what it looks like for the practitioner, all focus needs balancing across it's paradigmal constraints and so one finds themselves resting in cultural representations of darky things as a function of balancing that above application. As opposed to those folk who mimic the appearance of it as if it were the body of experience of it and wonder why they find themselves failing at the rest of life.....
Which is why a light path tends to be slower, because the 'lighty things as limits' governs to temper progress into selfish or selfish-like modes and methods progress.

Please login to view the answers